Что-то все чаще при анализе российской политики (и далеко не только внешней) вспоминается иноагент Козырев - истинный американец на посту Министра иностранных дел как символ российской либерастии.
Полезно освежить в памяти его достижения. Боюсь, не для прошлого - для будущего....
Что-то все чаще при анализе российской политики (и далеко не только внешней) вспоминается иноагент Козырев - истинный американец на посту Министра иностранных дел как символ российской либерастии.
Полезно освежить в памяти его достижения. Боюсь, не для прошлого - для будущего....
You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. "This time we received the coordinates of enemy vehicles marked 'V' in Kyiv region," it added. In the United States, Telegram's lower public profile has helped it mostly avoid high level scrutiny from Congress, but it has not gone unnoticed. Channels are not fully encrypted, end-to-end. All communications on a Telegram channel can be seen by anyone on the channel and are also visible to Telegram. Telegram may be asked by a government to hand over the communications from a channel. Telegram has a history of standing up to Russian government requests for data, but how comfortable you are relying on that history to predict future behavior is up to you. Because Telegram has this data, it may also be stolen by hackers or leaked by an internal employee. "The argument from Telegram is, 'You should trust us because we tell you that we're trustworthy,'" Maréchal said. "It's really in the eye of the beholder whether that's something you want to buy into."
from in
