⚡️Мы продолжаем серию публикаций о том, как функционирует фондовый рынок.
Сегодня расскажем об обратном выкупе акций и ключевых моментах, связанных с этим процессом. Ответим на вопросы: зачем компании проводят бай-бэк и как он отражается на доходности для инвестора?
Подробнее в карточках.
🧭Ссылки на другие наиболее значимые публикации доступны в Навигаторе БРК.
⚡️Мы продолжаем серию публикаций о том, как функционирует фондовый рынок.
Сегодня расскажем об обратном выкупе акций и ключевых моментах, связанных с этим процессом. Ответим на вопросы: зачем компании проводят бай-бэк и как он отражается на доходности для инвестора?
Подробнее в карточках.
🧭Ссылки на другие наиболее значимые публикации доступны в Навигаторе БРК.
The Security Service of Ukraine said in a tweet that it was able to effectively target Russian convoys near Kyiv because of messages sent to an official Telegram bot account called "STOP Russian War." Oh no. There’s a certain degree of myth-making around what exactly went on, so take everything that follows lightly. Telegram was originally launched as a side project by the Durov brothers, with Nikolai handling the coding and Pavel as CEO, while both were at VK. At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised. A Russian Telegram channel with over 700,000 followers is spreading disinformation about Russia's invasion of Ukraine under the guise of providing "objective information" and fact-checking fake news. Its influence extends beyond the platform, with major Russian publications, government officials, and journalists citing the page's posts. In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback.
from in
