ага. стенальщики забыли, что пока никчемный, с точки зрения технологии, манипулятивный биток искал дно осенью 22г, Тон с лета в это время рос и сделал 3х. а в декабре 22 Тон можно было вложить в номера и получить 40х за следующие полгода — т.е 120х менее чем за год!! но хомяки это пропустили, как и рост других проектов на Тоне и только ноют))
ага. стенальщики забыли, что пока никчемный, с точки зрения технологии, манипулятивный биток искал дно осенью 22г, Тон с лета в это время рос и сделал 3х. а в декабре 22 Тон можно было вложить в номера и получить 40х за следующие полгода — т.е 120х менее чем за год!! но хомяки это пропустили, как и рост других проектов на Тоне и только ноют))
BY Дайте TON!
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Markets continued to grapple with the economic and corporate earnings implications relating to the Russia-Ukraine conflict. “We have a ton of uncertainty right now,” said Stephanie Link, chief investment strategist and portfolio manager at Hightower Advisors. “We’re dealing with a war, we’re dealing with inflation. We don’t know what it means to earnings.” Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. These entities are reportedly operating nine Telegram channels with more than five million subscribers to whom they were making recommendations on selected listed scrips. Such recommendations induced the investors to deal in the said scrips, thereby creating artificial volume and price rise. Despite Telegram's origins, its approach to users' security has privacy advocates worried. Telegram, which does little policing of its content, has also became a hub for Russian propaganda and misinformation. Many pro-Kremlin channels have become popular, alongside accounts of journalists and other independent observers.
from in
