Telegram Group & Telegram Channel
Современный американский прагматизм». Интервью с Игорем Давидовичем Джохадзе

⚡️В 2023 году в издательстве Канон+ РООИ «Реабилитация» вышла книга Игоря Давидовича Джохадзе «Современный американский прагматизм».

🔸В монографии рассматриваются идеи трех ведущих представителей неопрагматизма – Ричарда Рорти, Хилари Патнэма и Роберта Брэндома.

🗣️ Мы побеседовали с автором о ключевых темах, которые обсуждаются на страницах книги, об интересе и о будущем прагматизма.

🌐 Подробнее



group-telegram.com/iph_ras/1368
Create:
Last Update:

Современный американский прагматизм». Интервью с Игорем Давидовичем Джохадзе

⚡️В 2023 году в издательстве Канон+ РООИ «Реабилитация» вышла книга Игоря Давидовича Джохадзе «Современный американский прагматизм».

🔸В монографии рассматриваются идеи трех ведущих представителей неопрагматизма – Ричарда Рорти, Хилари Патнэма и Роберта Брэндома.

🗣️ Мы побеседовали с автором о ключевых темах, которые обсуждаются на страницах книги, об интересе и о будущем прагматизма.

🌐 Подробнее

BY Институт философии РАН




Share with your friend now:
group-telegram.com/iph_ras/1368

View MORE
Open in Telegram


Telegram | DID YOU KNOW?

Date: |

Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. Some people used the platform to organize ahead of the storming of the U.S. Capitol in January 2021, and last month Senator Mark Warner sent a letter to Durov urging him to curb Russian information operations on Telegram. Such instructions could actually endanger people — citizens receive air strike warnings via smartphone alerts.
from in


Telegram Институт философии РАН
FROM American