"Расследование носит многоплановый характер и касается, в частности: нападения на российских оппозиционеров, связанных с Фондом борьбы с коррупцией, основанным Алексеем Навальным. В производстве рассматриваются события, произошедшие как в Европе (включая Вильнюс), так и в Южной и Северной Америке."
А то тут писали вчера уже некоторые, мол, "а откуда вы знаете, что Блинова за избиения арестовали..."
"Расследование носит многоплановый характер и касается, в частности: нападения на российских оппозиционеров, связанных с Фондом борьбы с коррупцией, основанным Алексеем Навальным. В производстве рассматриваются события, произошедшие как в Европе (включая Вильнюс), так и в Южной и Северной Америке."
А то тут писали вчера уже некоторые, мол, "а откуда вы знаете, что Блинова за избиения арестовали..."
Since its launch in 2013, Telegram has grown from a simple messaging app to a broadcast network. Its user base isn’t as vast as WhatsApp’s, and its broadcast platform is a fraction the size of Twitter, but it’s nonetheless showing its use. While Telegram has been embroiled in controversy for much of its life, it has become a vital source of communication during the invasion of Ukraine. But, if all of this is new to you, let us explain, dear friends, what on Earth a Telegram is meant to be, and why you should, or should not, need to care. Perpetrators of such fraud use various marketing techniques to attract subscribers on their social media channels. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. These administrators had built substantial positions in these scrips prior to the circulation of recommendations and offloaded their positions subsequent to rise in price of these scrips, making significant profits at the expense of unsuspecting investors, Sebi noted.
from in
