Тема тяжелая, страшная, но я однажды, будучи на лекции в Курчатовском Институте спросила у нашего замечательного ученого Михаила Ковальчука - а можно ли было обойтись без бомбы?
И после небольшой дискуссии поняла, что наверное, можно было. Только нашей страны давно бы не было.
Тема тяжелая, страшная, но я однажды, будучи на лекции в Курчатовском Институте спросила у нашего замечательного ученого Михаила Ковальчука - а можно ли было обойтись без бомбы?
И после небольшой дискуссии поняла, что наверное, можно было. Только нашей страны давно бы не было.
False news often spreads via public groups, or chats, with potentially fatal effects. Although some channels have been removed, the curation process is considered opaque and insufficient by analysts. Some people used the platform to organize ahead of the storming of the U.S. Capitol in January 2021, and last month Senator Mark Warner sent a letter to Durov urging him to curb Russian information operations on Telegram. But the Ukraine Crisis Media Center's Tsekhanovska points out that communications are often down in zones most affected by the war, making this sort of cross-referencing a luxury many cannot afford. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from in
