📣📣به اطلاع تمامی شرکت کنندگان و علاقه مندان رویداد ماد می رسانیم که رویداد ماد با یک روز تاخیر در تاریخ 1 خرداد 1403 در دانشکده پزشکی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تهران برگزار خواهد شد. همچنین به دلیل درخواست شما عزیزان مهلت ارسال پروپوزال نیز تا تاریخ 21 اردیبهشت ماه تمدید شد.
📌توجه داشته باشید که مهلت ارسال پروپوزال بیش از این تمدید نخواهد شد.
📣📣به اطلاع تمامی شرکت کنندگان و علاقه مندان رویداد ماد می رسانیم که رویداد ماد با یک روز تاخیر در تاریخ 1 خرداد 1403 در دانشکده پزشکی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تهران برگزار خواهد شد. همچنین به دلیل درخواست شما عزیزان مهلت ارسال پروپوزال نیز تا تاریخ 21 اردیبهشت ماه تمدید شد.
📌توجه داشته باشید که مهلت ارسال پروپوزال بیش از این تمدید نخواهد شد.
Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. It is unclear who runs the account, although Russia's official Ministry of Foreign Affairs Twitter account promoted the Telegram channel on Saturday and claimed it was operated by "a group of experts & journalists." Emerson Brooking, a disinformation expert at the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, said: "Back in the Wild West period of content moderation, like 2014 or 2015, maybe they could have gotten away with it, but it stands in marked contrast with how other companies run themselves today." But because group chats and the channel features are not end-to-end encrypted, Galperin said user privacy is potentially under threat.
from in
