На выходных гуляла по Нижнему. Смотрела всякие разные модерновские домики вокруг своего места обитания. Кажется, даже положенные десять тысяч шагов превзошла. Нижний — самый холмистый город, в котором мне доводилось жить. Ты никогда не идёшь по ровной дороге — или вверх, или вниз.
Обнаружила табличку с Балабановым. Он, оказывается, учился здесь на переводчика.
На выходных гуляла по Нижнему. Смотрела всякие разные модерновские домики вокруг своего места обитания. Кажется, даже положенные десять тысяч шагов превзошла. Нижний — самый холмистый город, в котором мне доводилось жить. Ты никогда не идёшь по ровной дороге — или вверх, или вниз.
Обнаружила табличку с Балабановым. Он, оказывается, учился здесь на переводчика.
The company maintains that it cannot act against individual or group chats, which are “private amongst their participants,” but it will respond to requests in relation to sticker sets, channels and bots which are publicly available. During the invasion of Ukraine, Pavel Durov has wrestled with this issue a lot more prominently than he has before. Channels like Donbass Insider and Bellum Acta, as reported by Foreign Policy, started pumping out pro-Russian propaganda as the invasion began. So much so that the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council issued a statement labeling which accounts are Russian-backed. Ukrainian officials, in potential violation of the Geneva Convention, have shared imagery of dead and captured Russian soldiers on the platform. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback. Russians and Ukrainians are both prolific users of Telegram. They rely on the app for channels that act as newsfeeds, group chats (both public and private), and one-to-one communication. Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine, Telegram has remained an important lifeline for both Russians and Ukrainians, as a way of staying aware of the latest news and keeping in touch with loved ones. Official government accounts have also spread fake fact checks. An official Twitter account for the Russia diplomatic mission in Geneva shared a fake debunking video claiming without evidence that "Western and Ukrainian media are creating thousands of fake news on Russia every day." The video, which has amassed almost 30,000 views, offered a "how-to" spot misinformation.
from in
