В московской квартире разгерметизировался и загорелся туристический газовый баллончик. Хозяин бросил его в ведро с водой и позвонил в МЧС России. Прибывшие огнеборцы потушили возгорание. К счастью, никто не пострадал.
МЧС России напоминает: ⚠️храни газовые баллончики в специальном шкафу; ⚠️не допускай нагрева корпуса; ⚠️береги от механических повреждений; ⚠️не распыляй вблизи источника огня.
В московской квартире разгерметизировался и загорелся туристический газовый баллончик. Хозяин бросил его в ведро с водой и позвонил в МЧС России. Прибывшие огнеборцы потушили возгорание. К счастью, никто не пострадал.
МЧС России напоминает: ⚠️храни газовые баллончики в специальном шкафу; ⚠️не допускай нагрева корпуса; ⚠️береги от механических повреждений; ⚠️не распыляй вблизи источника огня.
Telegram, which does little policing of its content, has also became a hub for Russian propaganda and misinformation. Many pro-Kremlin channels have become popular, alongside accounts of journalists and other independent observers. Groups are also not fully encrypted, end-to-end. This includes private groups. Private groups cannot be seen by other Telegram users, but Telegram itself can see the groups and all of the communications that you have in them. All of the same risks and warnings about channels can be applied to groups. But because group chats and the channel features are not end-to-end encrypted, Galperin said user privacy is potentially under threat. Oleksandra Matviichuk, a Kyiv-based lawyer and head of the Center for Civil Liberties, called Durov’s position "very weak," and urged concrete improvements. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations.
from in
