🇷🇺В результате работы операторов БПЛА было вскрыто замаскированное укрытие укронацистов. Точным выстрелом артиллерийским снарядом «Краснополь» оно было уничтожено💥 вместе с находящимися внутри боевиками☠️
🇷🇺В результате работы операторов БПЛА было вскрыто замаскированное укрытие укронацистов. Точным выстрелом артиллерийским снарядом «Краснополь» оно было уничтожено💥 вместе с находящимися внутри боевиками☠️
Individual messages can be fully encrypted. But the user has to turn on that function. It's not automatic, as it is on Signal and WhatsApp. The message was not authentic, with the real Zelenskiy soon denying the claim on his official Telegram channel, but the incident highlighted a major problem: disinformation quickly spreads unchecked on the encrypted app. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. Messages are not fully encrypted by default. That means the company could, in theory, access the content of the messages, or be forced to hand over the data at the request of a government. Either way, Durov says that he withdrew his resignation but that he was ousted from his company anyway. Subsequently, control of the company was reportedly handed to oligarchs Alisher Usmanov and Igor Sechin, both allegedly close associates of Russian leader Vladimir Putin.
from in
