Даже в случае какой-то разрядки, явного позитива для нашего СПГ всё равно не жду по очевидным причинам: Штатам нужно продавать свой, а Трамп нефтегаз поддерживает в целом. Вот ещё один звоночек. Намекают уже на замену Ямала на американский СПГ. https://1prime.ru/20241108/gaz-852699862.html
Даже в случае какой-то разрядки, явного позитива для нашего СПГ всё равно не жду по очевидным причинам: Штатам нужно продавать свой, а Трамп нефтегаз поддерживает в целом. Вот ещё один звоночек. Намекают уже на замену Ямала на американский СПГ. https://1prime.ru/20241108/gaz-852699862.html
Some privacy experts say Telegram is not secure enough Telegram boasts 500 million users, who share information individually and in groups in relative security. But Telegram's use as a one-way broadcast channel — which followers can join but not reply to — means content from inauthentic accounts can easily reach large, captive and eager audiences. Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback. Additionally, investors are often instructed to deposit monies into personal bank accounts of individuals who claim to represent a legitimate entity, and/or into an unrelated corporate account. To lend credence and to lure unsuspecting victims, perpetrators usually claim that their entity and/or the investment schemes are approved by financial authorities.
from in
