Совместно с Рейтингом Букмекеров мы проводим конкурс, в которой 20 счастливчиков разделят общий призовой фонд в 100 000₽:
10 000₽ — 1-5 место 6 000₽ — 6-10 место 3 000₽ — 11-15 место 1 000₽ — 16-20 место
Для участия необходимо подписаться на каналы БК Леон и РБ Спорт. Подписывайся и жми кнопку «Участвовать» под этим постом. А 9 декабря бот случайным образом выберет 20 победителей.
Совместно с Рейтингом Букмекеров мы проводим конкурс, в которой 20 счастливчиков разделят общий призовой фонд в 100 000₽:
10 000₽ — 1-5 место 6 000₽ — 6-10 место 3 000₽ — 11-15 место 1 000₽ — 16-20 место
Для участия необходимо подписаться на каналы БК Леон и РБ Спорт. Подписывайся и жми кнопку «Участвовать» под этим постом. А 9 декабря бот случайным образом выберет 20 победителей.
Multiple pro-Kremlin media figures circulated the post's false claims, including prominent Russian journalist Vladimir Soloviev and the state-controlled Russian outlet RT, according to the DFR Lab's report. The account, "War on Fakes," was created on February 24, the same day Russian President Vladimir Putin announced a "special military operation" and troops began invading Ukraine. The page is rife with disinformation, according to The Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, which studies digital extremism and published a report examining the channel. Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. Although some channels have been removed, the curation process is considered opaque and insufficient by analysts. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats.
from in
