"وقد أنتج ذلك فيما أنتج أن كل ما أخرج واقعنا التاريخى أو الحاضر، من فكر أو هيئات أو مؤسسات أو نظم إنما هى دائمًا إما نقص وإما نتوء وهو فى الحالتين شاذ أو استثناء لأنه دائمًا غير منسوب إلى ذاته أو وقائعه، ولكنه منسوب إلى نموذج آت من خبرة تاريخية مغايرة"..
"وقد أنتج ذلك فيما أنتج أن كل ما أخرج واقعنا التاريخى أو الحاضر، من فكر أو هيئات أو مؤسسات أو نظم إنما هى دائمًا إما نقص وإما نتوء وهو فى الحالتين شاذ أو استثناء لأنه دائمًا غير منسوب إلى ذاته أو وقائعه، ولكنه منسوب إلى نموذج آت من خبرة تاريخية مغايرة"..
Unlike Silicon Valley giants such as Facebook and Twitter, which run very public anti-disinformation programs, Brooking said: "Telegram is famously lax or absent in its content moderation policy." That hurt tech stocks. For the past few weeks, the 10-year yield has traded between 1.72% and 2%, as traders moved into the bond for safety when Russia headlines were ugly—and out of it when headlines improved. Now, the yield is touching its pandemic-era high. If the yield breaks above that level, that could signal that it’s on a sustainable path higher. Higher long-dated bond yields make future profits less valuable—and many tech companies are valued on the basis of profits forecast for many years in the future. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. So, uh, whenever I hear about Telegram, it’s always in relation to something bad. What gives? The picture was mixed overseas. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index fell 1.6%, under pressure from U.S. regulatory scrutiny on New York-listed Chinese companies. Stocks were more buoyant in Europe, where Frankfurt’s DAX surged 1.4%.
from in
