Филипп Киркоров ответил на недавний выпад Маргариты Симоньян в отношении Максима Галкина и Аллы Пугачевой, отметив, что если покопаться в грязном белье самой Маргариты, наверняка, тоже кое-что найдётся
Филипп Киркоров ответил на недавний выпад Маргариты Симоньян в отношении Максима Галкина и Аллы Пугачевой, отметив, что если покопаться в грязном белье самой Маргариты, наверняка, тоже кое-что найдётся
For example, WhatsApp restricted the number of times a user could forward something, and developed automated systems that detect and flag objectionable content. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. He adds: "Telegram has become my primary news source." He floated the idea of restricting the use of Telegram in Ukraine and Russia, a suggestion that was met with fierce opposition from users. Shortly after, Durov backed off the idea. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp.
from in
