🇺🇸 Либеральная пресса не заметила протестов в Канаде
Вот так выглядит передовица новостей New York Times. В ней нашлось место даже для прошлогодней «биржевой революции» GameStop. Но не нашлось места для такой мелочи, как самые массовые протесты в современной истории Канады. Это особенно удивительно с учётом того, что примерно половина грузовиков едут из США.
🇺🇸 Либеральная пресса не заметила протестов в Канаде
Вот так выглядит передовица новостей New York Times. В ней нашлось место даже для прошлогодней «биржевой революции» GameStop. Но не нашлось места для такой мелочи, как самые массовые протесты в современной истории Канады. Это особенно удивительно с учётом того, что примерно половина грузовиков едут из США.
At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised. These entities are reportedly operating nine Telegram channels with more than five million subscribers to whom they were making recommendations on selected listed scrips. Such recommendations induced the investors to deal in the said scrips, thereby creating artificial volume and price rise. Oh no. There’s a certain degree of myth-making around what exactly went on, so take everything that follows lightly. Telegram was originally launched as a side project by the Durov brothers, with Nikolai handling the coding and Pavel as CEO, while both were at VK. Just days after Russia invaded Ukraine, Durov wrote that Telegram was "increasingly becoming a source of unverified information," and he worried about the app being used to "incite ethnic hatred." The War on Fakes channel has repeatedly attempted to push conspiracies that footage from Ukraine is somehow being falsified. One post on the channel from February 24 claimed without evidence that a widely viewed photo of a Ukrainian woman injured in an airstrike in the city of Chuhuiv was doctored and that the woman was seen in a different photo days later without injuries. The post, which has over 600,000 views, also baselessly claimed that the woman's blood was actually makeup or grape juice.
from in
