Warning: file_put_contents(aCache/aDaily/post/ufo666ufo/-3305-3306-3307-3308-3309-3310-3311-3312-3313-3314-3315" target="_blank" rel="noopener" onclick="return confirm('Open this link?\n\n'+this.href);">"Ноосфера НС" № 1, 1991 </a>- щоквартальної науково-популярної збірки, який видавася за ініціціативою Московського регіонального Клубу дослідників аномальних явищ природи<br/><br/><a href="https://t.me/ufo666ufo/3305-): Failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 50 ОНИ | Telegram Webview: ufo666ufo/3313 -
З журналу "Ноосфера НС" № 1, 1991 - щоквартальної науково-популярної збірки, який видавася за ініціціативою Московського регіонального Клубу дослідників аномальних явищ природи
З журналу "Ноосфера НС" № 1, 1991 - щоквартальної науково-популярної збірки, який видавася за ініціціативою Московського регіонального Клубу дослідників аномальних явищ природи
In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback. Since January 2022, the SC has received a total of 47 complaints and enquiries on illegal investment schemes promoted through Telegram. These fraudulent schemes offer non-existent investment opportunities, promising very attractive and risk-free returns within a short span of time. They commonly offer unrealistic returns of as high as 1,000% within 24 hours or even within a few hours. Following this, Sebi, in an order passed in January 2022, established that the administrators of a Telegram channel having a large subscriber base enticed the subscribers to act upon recommendations that were circulated by those administrators on the channel, leading to significant price and volume impact in various scrips. "Like the bombing of the maternity ward in Mariupol," he said, "Even before it hits the news, you see the videos on the Telegram channels." The picture was mixed overseas. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index fell 1.6%, under pressure from U.S. regulatory scrutiny on New York-listed Chinese companies. Stocks were more buoyant in Europe, where Frankfurt’s DAX surged 1.4%.
from in