Итак, выкладываем импровизированный бюллетень президентской кампании 2024. Кандидаты от оппозиционных политических партий отобрались в ходе блиц-опросов среди наших подписчиков. По основному кандидату большинство решило, что будет самовыдвижение. Скоро узнаем насколько наши читатели были правы 😉 Активно наблюдаем 👀
1️⃣ЗЮГАНОВ Геннадий КПРФ 🛠 2️⃣НЕЧАЕВ Алексей Партия Новые люди 👨 3️⃣СЛУЦКИЙ Леонид ЛДПР 🗽 4️⃣ПУТИН Владимир 5️⃣ЯВЛИНСКИЙ Григорий Партия Яблоко🍎
Итак, выкладываем импровизированный бюллетень президентской кампании 2024. Кандидаты от оппозиционных политических партий отобрались в ходе блиц-опросов среди наших подписчиков. По основному кандидату большинство решило, что будет самовыдвижение. Скоро узнаем насколько наши читатели были правы 😉 Активно наблюдаем 👀
1️⃣ЗЮГАНОВ Геннадий КПРФ 🛠 2️⃣НЕЧАЕВ Алексей Партия Новые люди 👨 3️⃣СЛУЦКИЙ Леонид ЛДПР 🗽 4️⃣ПУТИН Владимир 5️⃣ЯВЛИНСКИЙ Григорий Партия Яблоко🍎
BY ВЫБОРЫ В ПИТЕРЕ
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Russians and Ukrainians are both prolific users of Telegram. They rely on the app for channels that act as newsfeeds, group chats (both public and private), and one-to-one communication. Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine, Telegram has remained an important lifeline for both Russians and Ukrainians, as a way of staying aware of the latest news and keeping in touch with loved ones. Since its launch in 2013, Telegram has grown from a simple messaging app to a broadcast network. Its user base isn’t as vast as WhatsApp’s, and its broadcast platform is a fraction the size of Twitter, but it’s nonetheless showing its use. While Telegram has been embroiled in controversy for much of its life, it has become a vital source of communication during the invasion of Ukraine. But, if all of this is new to you, let us explain, dear friends, what on Earth a Telegram is meant to be, and why you should, or should not, need to care. In the United States, Telegram's lower public profile has helped it mostly avoid high level scrutiny from Congress, but it has not gone unnoticed. These administrators had built substantial positions in these scrips prior to the circulation of recommendations and offloaded their positions subsequent to rise in price of these scrips, making significant profits at the expense of unsuspecting investors, Sebi noted. Although some channels have been removed, the curation process is considered opaque and insufficient by analysts.
from in
