Не иначе научит Маска как правильно старлинки запускать. Как бы, сколько раз говорил, что не беда в том что у нас управленцы дураки, беда в том что дуракам везде у нас дорога открыта, а не закрыта, после того как он доказал что дурак дураком. Ибо получается дурак в квадрате. Ну и да, навередить на таком месте сложно, вон Рогозин сенатором ни кому уже не навредит, но, народные деньги то все равно на их содержание тратить приходится, и ладно бы в ИТК, там они хотя бы лес рубили.
Не иначе научит Маска как правильно старлинки запускать. Как бы, сколько раз говорил, что не беда в том что у нас управленцы дураки, беда в том что дуракам везде у нас дорога открыта, а не закрыта, после того как он доказал что дурак дураком. Ибо получается дурак в квадрате. Ну и да, навередить на таком месте сложно, вон Рогозин сенатором ни кому уже не навредит, но, народные деньги то все равно на их содержание тратить приходится, и ладно бы в ИТК, там они хотя бы лес рубили.
BY Ярославский пехотинец Z🇷🇺
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
At this point, however, Durov had already been working on Telegram with his brother, and further planned a mobile-first social network with an explicit focus on anti-censorship. Later in April, he told TechCrunch that he had left Russia and had “no plans to go back,” saying that the nation was currently “incompatible with internet business at the moment.” He added later that he was looking for a country that matched his libertarian ideals to base his next startup. Messages are not fully encrypted by default. That means the company could, in theory, access the content of the messages, or be forced to hand over the data at the request of a government. Oleksandra Matviichuk, a Kyiv-based lawyer and head of the Center for Civil Liberties, called Durov’s position "very weak," and urged concrete improvements. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. Groups are also not fully encrypted, end-to-end. This includes private groups. Private groups cannot be seen by other Telegram users, but Telegram itself can see the groups and all of the communications that you have in them. All of the same risks and warnings about channels can be applied to groups.
from in
