Вагнеровцев по сути разогнали, "сидельцы" практически закончились, из Донецка, Луганска и национальных окраин выгребли практически весь мобресурс, а добровольцев, за действительное большие деньги, очевидно - немного.
Мобилизацию объявлять нужно, но не хочется, потому судя по всему мы пришли к облавам на улицах, ночных клубах и прочих общественных местах, что пока в основном в Москве проявляется.
Что ж, фронту нужны новые штурмовики, ведь другие формы достижения победы кроме "мясных штурмов" особенно не рассматриваются.
Вагнеровцев по сути разогнали, "сидельцы" практически закончились, из Донецка, Луганска и национальных окраин выгребли практически весь мобресурс, а добровольцев, за действительное большие деньги, очевидно - немного.
Мобилизацию объявлять нужно, но не хочется, потому судя по всему мы пришли к облавам на улицах, ночных клубах и прочих общественных местах, что пока в основном в Москве проявляется.
Что ж, фронту нужны новые штурмовики, ведь другие формы достижения победы кроме "мясных штурмов" особенно не рассматриваются.
BY Зона особого внимания
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
At its heart, Telegram is little more than a messaging app like WhatsApp or Signal. But it also offers open channels that enable a single user, or a group of users, to communicate with large numbers in a method similar to a Twitter account. This has proven to be both a blessing and a curse for Telegram and its users, since these channels can be used for both good and ill. Right now, as Wired reports, the app is a key way for Ukrainians to receive updates from the government during the invasion. Pavel Durov, a billionaire who embraces an all-black wardrobe and is often compared to the character Neo from "the Matrix," funds Telegram through his personal wealth and debt financing. And despite being one of the world's most popular tech companies, Telegram reportedly has only about 30 employees who defer to Durov for most major decisions about the platform. These administrators had built substantial positions in these scrips prior to the circulation of recommendations and offloaded their positions subsequent to rise in price of these scrips, making significant profits at the expense of unsuspecting investors, Sebi noted. But because group chats and the channel features are not end-to-end encrypted, Galperin said user privacy is potentially under threat. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats.
from in
