Ой. 19 марта Путин назвал «шантажом» предупреждения о терактах. Как сообщал ТАСС, «на коллегии ФСБ глава государства напомнил "о недавних провокационных заявлениях ряда официальных западных структур о возможности терактов в России". "Все это напоминает откровенный шантаж и намерение запугать, дестабилизировать наше общество", - [был] уверен Путин».
Ой. 19 марта Путин назвал «шантажом» предупреждения о терактах. Как сообщал ТАСС, «на коллегии ФСБ глава государства напомнил "о недавних провокационных заявлениях ряда официальных западных структур о возможности терактов в России". "Все это напоминает откровенный шантаж и намерение запугать, дестабилизировать наше общество", - [был] уверен Путин».
He said that since his platform does not have the capacity to check all channels, it may restrict some in Russia and Ukraine "for the duration of the conflict," but then reversed course hours later after many users complained that Telegram was an important source of information. The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) had carried out a similar exercise in 2017 in a matter related to circulation of messages through WhatsApp. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. Russians and Ukrainians are both prolific users of Telegram. They rely on the app for channels that act as newsfeeds, group chats (both public and private), and one-to-one communication. Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine, Telegram has remained an important lifeline for both Russians and Ukrainians, as a way of staying aware of the latest news and keeping in touch with loved ones.
from us
