المراجعة النهائية لمكتبة #عالم_الأدب 🤣 الجزء الأول 😁
بما إن أهم حدث في الصيف قارب على الانتهاء فألحق استغل خصومات #ذكرى_التأسيس_التاسعة وكمل اللي ناقص مكتبتك من أكتر من 50 عنوان نفسي وطبي وتنمية ذاتية (اضغط على القسم للإطلاع على إصداراته)
المراجعة النهائية لمكتبة #عالم_الأدب 🤣 الجزء الأول 😁
بما إن أهم حدث في الصيف قارب على الانتهاء فألحق استغل خصومات #ذكرى_التأسيس_التاسعة وكمل اللي ناقص مكتبتك من أكتر من 50 عنوان نفسي وطبي وتنمية ذاتية (اضغط على القسم للإطلاع على إصداراته)
As the war in Ukraine rages, the messaging app Telegram has emerged as the go-to place for unfiltered live war updates for both Ukrainian refugees and increasingly isolated Russians alike. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. False news often spreads via public groups, or chats, with potentially fatal effects. The War on Fakes channel has repeatedly attempted to push conspiracies that footage from Ukraine is somehow being falsified. One post on the channel from February 24 claimed without evidence that a widely viewed photo of a Ukrainian woman injured in an airstrike in the city of Chuhuiv was doctored and that the woman was seen in a different photo days later without injuries. The post, which has over 600,000 views, also baselessly claimed that the woman's blood was actually makeup or grape juice. On Feb. 27, however, he admitted from his Russian-language account that "Telegram channels are increasingly becoming a source of unverified information related to Ukrainian events."
from it
