ОТМЕНА 30 сентября, понедельник, 19:30 Sandomirsky & Raiten Duo live in Babel store
Музыка, которая рождается на ваших глазах. Фри-джаз, свободный джаз, джазовая импровизация — как ни назови (только в печь не ставь)... Дуэт Григория Сандомирского (клавишные) и Итая Райтена (баритон саксофон) будет творить музыку здесь и сейчас. Не повторяется такое никогда.
ОТМЕНА 30 сентября, понедельник, 19:30 Sandomirsky & Raiten Duo live in Babel store
Музыка, которая рождается на ваших глазах. Фри-джаз, свободный джаз, джазовая импровизация — как ни назови (только в печь не ставь)... Дуэт Григория Сандомирского (клавишные) и Итая Райтена (баритон саксофон) будет творить музыку здесь и сейчас. Не повторяется такое никогда.
Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. So, uh, whenever I hear about Telegram, it’s always in relation to something bad. What gives? If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from it
