Forwarded from Estonian Weltanschauung
Tiit Madisson's political views were complex and highly polarized, reflecting a trajectory from anti-Soviet dissident to nationalist and radical right-wing or even Third Positionist thinker:
As a driving force behind the Hirvepark rally and co-founder of MRP-AEG, Madisson campaigned fiercely against the Soviet system, insisting on exposing the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact and restoring Estonian sovereignty. In independent Estonia, he remained uncompromisingly critical of what he labeled a "neocommunist system", arguing that former communists retained key power positions—calling for a complete dismantling of what he saw as an authoritarian governance structure, though he did acknowledge that Estonia's elite only transitioned from communism to liberal-democracy and neoliberal economics, the people themselves remained the same. Thus, the Singing Revolution to him had failed and was a farce of a revolution.
In the 1990s, he harshly critiqued the shock therapy policies and neoliberal economics (as well as the Judeophilia and Zionism of the ruling 'new'-old corrupt elite) which he believed was destroying the Estonian people, and thus, he arrived at radical right wing and Third Position politics. He opposed Estonia joining both the European Union and NATO, remaining critical of both throughout his entire lifetime. In his book Maailma uus kord (2004), Madisson framed the Estonian state and central bank as controlled by Freemason-led elites.
Madisson’s 2006 book Holokaust. XX sajandi masendavaim sionistlik vale denied the Holocaust, labeling it the "greatest Zionist lie." He claimed most victims died of disease, not genocidal intent. These views ended up placing him firmly in the radical nationalist periphery of politics, attracting widespread condemnation from the mainstream. Tiit was a Christian, Catholic by denomination, having converted in gulag. In 2009, he attempted to revive the Estonian National Independence Party (ERSP) along Vaps and National Socialist views.
As a driving force behind the Hirvepark rally and co-founder of MRP-AEG, Madisson campaigned fiercely against the Soviet system, insisting on exposing the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact and restoring Estonian sovereignty. In independent Estonia, he remained uncompromisingly critical of what he labeled a "neocommunist system", arguing that former communists retained key power positions—calling for a complete dismantling of what he saw as an authoritarian governance structure, though he did acknowledge that Estonia's elite only transitioned from communism to liberal-democracy and neoliberal economics, the people themselves remained the same. Thus, the Singing Revolution to him had failed and was a farce of a revolution.
In the 1990s, he harshly critiqued the shock therapy policies and neoliberal economics (as well as the Judeophilia and Zionism of the ruling 'new'-old corrupt elite) which he believed was destroying the Estonian people, and thus, he arrived at radical right wing and Third Position politics. He opposed Estonia joining both the European Union and NATO, remaining critical of both throughout his entire lifetime. In his book Maailma uus kord (2004), Madisson framed the Estonian state and central bank as controlled by Freemason-led elites.
Madisson’s 2006 book Holokaust. XX sajandi masendavaim sionistlik vale denied the Holocaust, labeling it the "greatest Zionist lie." He claimed most victims died of disease, not genocidal intent. These views ended up placing him firmly in the radical nationalist periphery of politics, attracting widespread condemnation from the mainstream. Tiit was a Christian, Catholic by denomination, having converted in gulag. In 2009, he attempted to revive the Estonian National Independence Party (ERSP) along Vaps and National Socialist views.
👏1😁1
Forwarded from Salò Dixiecrat
The Chicano movement (whose symbols and slogans have been featured at the recent riots) was an anti-Hispanic leftist movement who hated the Spanish empire and were nominally liberal Catholics at best and syncretist pagans at worst.
🤬8❤1😁1
A Catholicism that is raised up to the level of a truly universal, unanimous, and perennial tradition where faith can be integrated into a metaphysical realization, the symbol integrated into the path to awakening, the rites and sacraments into acts of power, dogmas into expressions of an absolute and infallible consciousness because it is beyond human and, as such, alive in beings unbound from terrestrial chains through an ascesis, and where the pontificate recovers its primal mediating function — such a Catholicism could supplant every “spiritualism”, both present and future.
- Julius Evola, Mask and Face of Contemporary Spirituality
❤6😁1
Forwarded from NATIONAL UNITY (Crigga ⴲ)
IN MEMORY OF THE RNU COMPANIONS WHO DIED IN OCTOBER '93
Comrades of the Russian National Unity who died defending the Supreme Soviet of Russia on October 4, 1993 in Moscow:
Marchenko Dmitry Valerievich, born in 1965, reserve captain S.A., comrade of the RNU since its foundation. He died on the evening of October 4, brutally beaten by the brutalized militants of
Yeltsin-Chubais. According to eyewitnesses, he fought hand-to-hand to the end.
Sursky Anatoly Mikhailovich, born in 1947, guard major, participated in repelling the landing of two landing groups on the roof of the Supreme Soviet building, killed by a sniper.
We all remember the "gentlemen" liberals and other lovers of the West.
We all remember.
Remember, Lord, the warriors Dmitry and Anatoly in Thy Kingdom
Comrades of the Russian National Unity who died defending the Supreme Soviet of Russia on October 4, 1993 in Moscow:
Marchenko Dmitry Valerievich, born in 1965, reserve captain S.A., comrade of the RNU since its foundation. He died on the evening of October 4, brutally beaten by the brutalized militants of
Yeltsin-Chubais. According to eyewitnesses, he fought hand-to-hand to the end.
Sursky Anatoly Mikhailovich, born in 1947, guard major, participated in repelling the landing of two landing groups on the roof of the Supreme Soviet building, killed by a sniper.
We all remember the "gentlemen" liberals and other lovers of the West.
We all remember.
Remember, Lord, the warriors Dmitry and Anatoly in Thy Kingdom
❤8😁3
I do not care how I die, but for what I die. I do not count the years I have lived, but the deeds I have carried out. Tonight they will execute me, but the sons of my creed will triumph, and their triumph will come as a revenge for my death. We all die, but few of us earn the honor of dying for a creed. How shameful this night is to history, to our descendants, to our expatriates, and to foreigners. It seems that the independence we watered with our blood on the day we planted it is now thirsting for our veins anew.
- Antoun Saadeh's words executed today July 8th 1949
❤5😁1
Forwarded from Oltre la Morte
"The damned generation that came before us cultivated anti-heroic and defeatist values.
They were unfaithful to Hispanic blood, bowing servilely before the foreigner. This cannot be — and it will not be! Today, heroism must be wielded at home. No alliances with the old traitors! The political nerve of youth cannot accept the comfortable dilemmas offered to it.
The revolution must be deeper — in substance and structure, not surface. The old pacifists and the shallow want to stop everything with their clichés.
Away with them! Let us return to Hispanic authenticity, to Hispanic imperatives.
On one side, the new Spaniard with a new responsibility. On the other, the old Spaniard, burdened with the tired responsibility of his wailing and tears."
– Ramiro Ledesma Ramos 🇪🇸 | La Conquista del Estado
They were unfaithful to Hispanic blood, bowing servilely before the foreigner. This cannot be — and it will not be! Today, heroism must be wielded at home. No alliances with the old traitors! The political nerve of youth cannot accept the comfortable dilemmas offered to it.
The revolution must be deeper — in substance and structure, not surface. The old pacifists and the shallow want to stop everything with their clichés.
Away with them! Let us return to Hispanic authenticity, to Hispanic imperatives.
On one side, the new Spaniard with a new responsibility. On the other, the old Spaniard, burdened with the tired responsibility of his wailing and tears."
– Ramiro Ledesma Ramos 🇪🇸 | La Conquista del Estado
🔥3😁1
Forwarded from The Inkless Pen
What follows is a very interesting quote from the philosopher Rene Guenon. It is helpful to note that he did not count most modern Protestant groups as Christian, he saw them as products of modernity. He treats primarily with Roman Catholicism (in his times pre-Vatican II), because of its prominence in the West, when he thinks of “Christianity”. Nonetheless, a number of his points are of great interest and worth considering. Ultimately, authentic Orthodoxy holds the seeds of resurrection for the West.
“The modern West is said to be Christian, but this is untrue; the modern outlook is anti-Christian, because it is essentially anti-religious; and it is anti-religious because it is essentially anti-traditional; this is its distinguishing characteristic and this is what makes it what it is. Undoubtedly, something of Christianity has passed even into the anti-Christian civilization of our times, even the most 'advanced' of whose representatives, to use their own jargon, cannot help, involuntary and perhaps unconsciously, having undergone and still undergoing certain Christian influence, tough an indirect one; however radical a breach with the past may be, it can never be quite complete and such as to break all continuity. More than this: we assert that everything of value that there may be in the modern world has come to it from Christianity, or at any rate through Christianity, for Christianity has brought with it the whole heritage of former traditions, has kept this heritage alive so far as the state of things in the West made it possible, and still contains its latent possibilities. But is there anyone today, even among those who call themselves Christians, who has any real consciousness of these possibilities? Where is to be found, even in Catholicism, the men who know the deeper meaning of the doctrines that they profess outwardly, and who, not content with 'believing' in a more or less superficial way –and more through sentiment than intelligence– really 'know' the truth of the traditions they hold to be theirs? We would wish to see proof that there are at least a few such men, for this would be the greatest and perhaps the sole hope of salvation for the West; but we have to admit that, up to the present, we have not encountered any … The West was Christian in the Middle Ages, but is so no longer; if anyone should reply that it may again become so, we will rejoinder that no one desires this more than we do, and may it come about sooner than all we round about us would lead us to expect. But let no one delude himself on this point: if this should happen, the modern world will have lived its day,” Rene Guenon (The Crisis of the Modern World).
“The modern West is said to be Christian, but this is untrue; the modern outlook is anti-Christian, because it is essentially anti-religious; and it is anti-religious because it is essentially anti-traditional; this is its distinguishing characteristic and this is what makes it what it is. Undoubtedly, something of Christianity has passed even into the anti-Christian civilization of our times, even the most 'advanced' of whose representatives, to use their own jargon, cannot help, involuntary and perhaps unconsciously, having undergone and still undergoing certain Christian influence, tough an indirect one; however radical a breach with the past may be, it can never be quite complete and such as to break all continuity. More than this: we assert that everything of value that there may be in the modern world has come to it from Christianity, or at any rate through Christianity, for Christianity has brought with it the whole heritage of former traditions, has kept this heritage alive so far as the state of things in the West made it possible, and still contains its latent possibilities. But is there anyone today, even among those who call themselves Christians, who has any real consciousness of these possibilities? Where is to be found, even in Catholicism, the men who know the deeper meaning of the doctrines that they profess outwardly, and who, not content with 'believing' in a more or less superficial way –and more through sentiment than intelligence– really 'know' the truth of the traditions they hold to be theirs? We would wish to see proof that there are at least a few such men, for this would be the greatest and perhaps the sole hope of salvation for the West; but we have to admit that, up to the present, we have not encountered any … The West was Christian in the Middle Ages, but is so no longer; if anyone should reply that it may again become so, we will rejoinder that no one desires this more than we do, and may it come about sooner than all we round about us would lead us to expect. But let no one delude himself on this point: if this should happen, the modern world will have lived its day,” Rene Guenon (The Crisis of the Modern World).
🔥3❤2