Вот поэтому, наверное, столь пристально и смотрит на Африку "долгое государство Путина". На лакуну которого (в т.ч. в отношении "долготы") как бы намекает репост нашего с вами уважаемого коллеги КбБ. Надеемся прочитать в продолжении, анонсированном репостнутым автором коммента.
Вот поэтому, наверное, столь пристально и смотрит на Африку "долгое государство Путина". На лакуну которого (в т.ч. в отношении "долготы") как бы намекает репост нашего с вами уважаемого коллеги КбБ. Надеемся прочитать в продолжении, анонсированном репостнутым автором коммента.
BY Спец по специям
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
He floated the idea of restricting the use of Telegram in Ukraine and Russia, a suggestion that was met with fierce opposition from users. Shortly after, Durov backed off the idea. "There are several million Russians who can lift their head up from propaganda and try to look for other sources, and I'd say that most look for it on Telegram," he said. On December 23rd, 2020, Pavel Durov posted to his channel that the company would need to start generating revenue. In early 2021, he added that any advertising on the platform would not use user data for targeting, and that it would be focused on “large one-to-many channels.” He pledged that ads would be “non-intrusive” and that most users would simply not notice any change. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. DFR Lab sent the image through Microsoft Azure's Face Verification program and found that it was "highly unlikely" that the person in the second photo was the same as the first woman. The fact-checker Logically AI also found the claim to be false. The woman, Olena Kurilo, was also captured in a video after the airstrike and shown to have the injuries.
from it