И только одна реакция нас удивила и откровенно разочаровала: ответ Ивана Апостолевского. Молодой депутат Законодательного собрания Ленобласти от КПРФ, выслушав наш вопрос, ответил так: "У меня выходной, не до этого, позвоните в другое время". Что ж - такое время: каждый сам выбирает главное.
И только одна реакция нас удивила и откровенно разочаровала: ответ Ивана Апостолевского. Молодой депутат Законодательного собрания Ленобласти от КПРФ, выслушав наш вопрос, ответил так: "У меня выходной, не до этого, позвоните в другое время". Что ж - такое время: каждый сам выбирает главное.
This ability to mix the public and the private, as well as the ability to use bots to engage with users has proved to be problematic. In early 2021, a database selling phone numbers pulled from Facebook was selling numbers for $20 per lookup. Similarly, security researchers found a network of deepfake bots on the platform that were generating images of people submitted by users to create non-consensual imagery, some of which involved children. The War on Fakes channel has repeatedly attempted to push conspiracies that footage from Ukraine is somehow being falsified. One post on the channel from February 24 claimed without evidence that a widely viewed photo of a Ukrainian woman injured in an airstrike in the city of Chuhuiv was doctored and that the woman was seen in a different photo days later without injuries. The post, which has over 600,000 views, also baselessly claimed that the woman's blood was actually makeup or grape juice. Recently, Durav wrote on his Telegram channel that users' right to privacy, in light of the war in Ukraine, is "sacred, now more than ever." Although some channels have been removed, the curation process is considered opaque and insufficient by analysts. So, uh, whenever I hear about Telegram, it’s always in relation to something bad. What gives?
from it
