И кстати, Габов сегодня "поехал" не один. Вчера по адресу ещё одного стримера ФБКашников тоже прошёл обыск и совсем скоро Сергей Карелин тоже начнёт думать, зачем связался с экстремистами?!?! Но уже в СИЗО, ну и потом в колонии
И кстати, Габов сегодня "поехал" не один. Вчера по адресу ещё одного стримера ФБКашников тоже прошёл обыск и совсем скоро Сергей Карелин тоже начнёт думать, зачем связался с экстремистами?!?! Но уже в СИЗО, ну и потом в колонии
BY Товарищ Z майор
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Some privacy experts say Telegram is not secure enough If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback. "Like the bombing of the maternity ward in Mariupol," he said, "Even before it hits the news, you see the videos on the Telegram channels." Telegram boasts 500 million users, who share information individually and in groups in relative security. But Telegram's use as a one-way broadcast channel — which followers can join but not reply to — means content from inauthentic accounts can easily reach large, captive and eager audiences.
from it
