🎥 رژیم صهیونیستی در آتش؛ درخواست «یائیر لاپید» و «ایهود باراک» از مردم برای اعتصابات و اعتراضات سراسری!
نخست‌وزیران سابق اسرائیل: 🔺مسئولان شکست هفت اکتبر می‌خواهند کشورمان را نابود کنند؛ ما اجازه نمی‌دهیم این دولتِ ویرانی، کشور را تجزیه و متلاشی کند! مردم اعتصاب و نافرمانی مدنی کنند و تا سقوط دولت خیابان‌ها را ترک نکنند؛ ما یک دولت و نخست‌وزیر نالایق داریم که باید برود!
🎥 رژیم صهیونیستی در آتش؛ درخواست «یائیر لاپید» و «ایهود باراک» از مردم برای اعتصابات و اعتراضات سراسری!
نخست‌وزیران سابق اسرائیل: 🔺مسئولان شکست هفت اکتبر می‌خواهند کشورمان را نابود کنند؛ ما اجازه نمی‌دهیم این دولتِ ویرانی، کشور را تجزیه و متلاشی کند! مردم اعتصاب و نافرمانی مدنی کنند و تا سقوط دولت خیابان‌ها را ترک نکنند؛ ما یک دولت و نخست‌وزیر نالایق داریم که باید برود!
On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. On Feb. 27, however, he admitted from his Russian-language account that "Telegram channels are increasingly becoming a source of unverified information related to Ukrainian events." Asked about its stance on disinformation, Telegram spokesperson Remi Vaughn told AFP: "As noted by our CEO, the sheer volume of information being shared on channels makes it extremely difficult to verify, so it's important that users double-check what they read." "There are a lot of things that Telegram could have been doing this whole time. And they know exactly what they are and they've chosen not to do them. That's why I don't trust them," she said. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from it
