Кинулись жать на кнопки, но к ФОМовскому результату - 70% мечтает, чтоб и дальше Путин правил и володел, - приблизиться так и не смогли. 40% все равно против 5-го путинского срока.
Ох, нелегко Памфиловой и Кириенко при всех их "пеньках" будет рисовать искомые 90%. А меньше ведь никак нельзя - противоречит тезису о всенародном сплочении вокруг Путина. Как объяснишь, что народ сплотился, но всего на 60%?
Кинулись жать на кнопки, но к ФОМовскому результату - 70% мечтает, чтоб и дальше Путин правил и володел, - приблизиться так и не смогли. 40% все равно против 5-го путинского срока.
Ох, нелегко Памфиловой и Кириенко при всех их "пеньках" будет рисовать искомые 90%. А меньше ведь никак нельзя - противоречит тезису о всенародном сплочении вокруг Путина. Как объяснишь, что народ сплотился, но всего на 60%?
Since its launch in 2013, Telegram has grown from a simple messaging app to a broadcast network. Its user base isn’t as vast as WhatsApp’s, and its broadcast platform is a fraction the size of Twitter, but it’s nonetheless showing its use. While Telegram has been embroiled in controversy for much of its life, it has become a vital source of communication during the invasion of Ukraine. But, if all of this is new to you, let us explain, dear friends, what on Earth a Telegram is meant to be, and why you should, or should not, need to care. Sebi said data, emails and other documents are being retrieved from the seized devices and detailed investigation is in progress. "There are a lot of things that Telegram could have been doing this whole time. And they know exactly what they are and they've chosen not to do them. That's why I don't trust them," she said. Pavel Durov, a billionaire who embraces an all-black wardrobe and is often compared to the character Neo from "the Matrix," funds Telegram through his personal wealth and debt financing. And despite being one of the world's most popular tech companies, Telegram reportedly has only about 30 employees who defer to Durov for most major decisions about the platform. Additionally, investors are often instructed to deposit monies into personal bank accounts of individuals who claim to represent a legitimate entity, and/or into an unrelated corporate account. To lend credence and to lure unsuspecting victims, perpetrators usually claim that their entity and/or the investment schemes are approved by financial authorities.
from it
