За последние 3 дня в Буркина-Фасо силами боевиков проалькаидовской JNIM были атакованы 7 военных баз.
🇧🇫Сообщается об очередной атаке на военный объект под Фада-Нгурма, Восточная область. 4 солдата правительственных войск убиты, захвачено оружие. Сам объект теперь под контролем террористов.
🔫Об уязвимости этого района из-за близости к Национальному парку W (особо охраняемая природная территория с густым травостоем и лесом) я писала ранее, в свете предыдущих нападений: https://www.group-telegram.com/it/angiezen.com/2036
За последние 3 дня в Буркина-Фасо силами боевиков проалькаидовской JNIM были атакованы 7 военных баз.
🇧🇫Сообщается об очередной атаке на военный объект под Фада-Нгурма, Восточная область. 4 солдата правительственных войск убиты, захвачено оружие. Сам объект теперь под контролем террористов.
🔫Об уязвимости этого района из-за близости к Национальному парку W (особо охраняемая природная территория с густым травостоем и лесом) я писала ранее, в свете предыдущих нападений: https://www.group-telegram.com/it/angiezen.com/2036
So, uh, whenever I hear about Telegram, it’s always in relation to something bad. What gives? Telegram, which does little policing of its content, has also became a hub for Russian propaganda and misinformation. Many pro-Kremlin channels have become popular, alongside accounts of journalists and other independent observers. Emerson Brooking, a disinformation expert at the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, said: "Back in the Wild West period of content moderation, like 2014 or 2015, maybe they could have gotten away with it, but it stands in marked contrast with how other companies run themselves today." "There are several million Russians who can lift their head up from propaganda and try to look for other sources, and I'd say that most look for it on Telegram," he said. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations.
from it
