Warning: mkdir(): No space left on device in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 37
Warning: file_put_contents(aCache/aDaily/post/australiaoneparty_official/-45574-45575-45574-): Failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 50 AustraliaOneParty_Official | Telegram Webview: australiaoneparty_official/45575 -
Brian Cates @drawandstrike There are only 2 possibilities when Rience Priebus says to @GenFlynn that he and others were shown a document by then-FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe and Deputy AG Sally Yates that showed Flynn discussing sanctions with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak.
Because the actual transcripts of the phone calls **clearly show Flynn never discussed any sanctions**...
1. McCabe and Yates showed Priebus and others a FAKE DOCUMENT that made a false claim
or
2. Priebus is not telling the truth when he told Flynn he and others [presumably Trump and Pence among them] were shown such a document by McCabe and Yates.
I am **really hoping** once @PamBondi is running the DOJ and @Kash_Patel is in charge of the FBI, SOMEBODY can get to the bottom of this.
❓Does that faked document claiming Flynn discussed sanctions actually exist?
❓Or did Priebus just make it up?
❗️INQUIRING MINDS WANT TO KNOW.
Since this mythical 'Logan Act violation' was the impetus for Flynn's firing and then his more than 3 years prosecution by the FBI/DOJ/Mueller Special Counsel for supposedly lying to federal agents about discussing those sanctions, and this supposed document was flashed around to justify Flynn's firing, whether or not it ACTUALLY EXISTS is a very important question.
Somebody not only had to engage in a federal crime by leaking classified intelligence transcripts of the Flynn/Kislyak phone calls...
❗️THERE WAS NOTHING ACTUALLY IN THE PHONE CALL TRANSCRIPTS THAT COULD BE USED TO ATTACK FLYNN WITH.
So somebody - we still don't know who - was forced to get EXCEEDINGLY CLEVER here to present the **appearance** that Flynn had discussed sanctions with Kislyak when in fact, he hadn't.
So the criminal leak of the classified transcripts is COMPOUNDED by criminal manufacture of a fake 'crime' to prosecute Flynn for:
Supposedly lying to two FBI agents about sanctions when it is now an uncontestable matter of PUBLIC RECORD that Flynn did not lie to them.
I will not leave this alone. Someone is going to end up paying for both the criminal leak and the false accusation that wasn't even in the leaked transcripts.
Brian Cates @drawandstrike There are only 2 possibilities when Rience Priebus says to @GenFlynn that he and others were shown a document by then-FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe and Deputy AG Sally Yates that showed Flynn discussing sanctions with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak.
Because the actual transcripts of the phone calls **clearly show Flynn never discussed any sanctions**...
1. McCabe and Yates showed Priebus and others a FAKE DOCUMENT that made a false claim
or
2. Priebus is not telling the truth when he told Flynn he and others [presumably Trump and Pence among them] were shown such a document by McCabe and Yates.
I am **really hoping** once @PamBondi is running the DOJ and @Kash_Patel is in charge of the FBI, SOMEBODY can get to the bottom of this.
❓Does that faked document claiming Flynn discussed sanctions actually exist?
❓Or did Priebus just make it up?
❗️INQUIRING MINDS WANT TO KNOW.
Since this mythical 'Logan Act violation' was the impetus for Flynn's firing and then his more than 3 years prosecution by the FBI/DOJ/Mueller Special Counsel for supposedly lying to federal agents about discussing those sanctions, and this supposed document was flashed around to justify Flynn's firing, whether or not it ACTUALLY EXISTS is a very important question.
Somebody not only had to engage in a federal crime by leaking classified intelligence transcripts of the Flynn/Kislyak phone calls...
❗️THERE WAS NOTHING ACTUALLY IN THE PHONE CALL TRANSCRIPTS THAT COULD BE USED TO ATTACK FLYNN WITH.
So somebody - we still don't know who - was forced to get EXCEEDINGLY CLEVER here to present the **appearance** that Flynn had discussed sanctions with Kislyak when in fact, he hadn't.
So the criminal leak of the classified transcripts is COMPOUNDED by criminal manufacture of a fake 'crime' to prosecute Flynn for:
Supposedly lying to two FBI agents about sanctions when it is now an uncontestable matter of PUBLIC RECORD that Flynn did not lie to them.
I will not leave this alone. Someone is going to end up paying for both the criminal leak and the false accusation that wasn't even in the leaked transcripts.
At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised. This provided opportunity to their linked entities to offload their shares at higher prices and make significant profits at the cost of unsuspecting retail investors. What distinguishes the app from competitors is its use of what's known as channels: Public or private feeds of photos and videos that can be set up by one person or an organization. The channels have become popular with on-the-ground journalists, aid workers and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who broadcasts on a Telegram channel. The channels can be followed by an unlimited number of people. Unlike Facebook, Twitter and other popular social networks, there is no advertising on Telegram and the flow of information is not driven by an algorithm. The War on Fakes channel has repeatedly attempted to push conspiracies that footage from Ukraine is somehow being falsified. One post on the channel from February 24 claimed without evidence that a widely viewed photo of a Ukrainian woman injured in an airstrike in the city of Chuhuiv was doctored and that the woman was seen in a different photo days later without injuries. The post, which has over 600,000 views, also baselessly claimed that the woman's blood was actually makeup or grape juice. But Telegram says people want to keep their chat history when they get a new phone, and they like having a data backup that will sync their chats across multiple devices. And that is why they let people choose whether they want their messages to be encrypted or not. When not turned on, though, chats are stored on Telegram's services, which are scattered throughout the world. But it has "disclosed 0 bytes of user data to third parties, including governments," Telegram states on its website.
from it
