Мы сегодня вовсю занимались заготовками салатов на завтра, готовили (наверное, как и все)
А на прошлой неделе ходили гулять втроем по городу и зашли в наше уже любимое место ПокеРамен🍝 Подкрепились вкусными ланчами и полюбовались красотой их интерьера😍
Были там прошлым летом, в комментариях поделюсь фотокарточками🔜
Мы сегодня вовсю занимались заготовками салатов на завтра, готовили (наверное, как и все)
А на прошлой неделе ходили гулять втроем по городу и зашли в наше уже любимое место ПокеРамен🍝 Подкрепились вкусными ланчами и полюбовались красотой их интерьера😍
Были там прошлым летом, в комментариях поделюсь фотокарточками🔜
So, uh, whenever I hear about Telegram, it’s always in relation to something bad. What gives? Oleksandra Matviichuk, a Kyiv-based lawyer and head of the Center for Civil Liberties, called Durov’s position "very weak," and urged concrete improvements. A Russian Telegram channel with over 700,000 followers is spreading disinformation about Russia's invasion of Ukraine under the guise of providing "objective information" and fact-checking fake news. Its influence extends beyond the platform, with major Russian publications, government officials, and journalists citing the page's posts. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. Andrey, a Russian entrepreneur living in Brazil who, fearing retaliation, asked that NPR not use his last name, said Telegram has become one of the few places Russians can access independent news about the war.
from it
