⟨⟨ ой ашалеть а у кого сегодня день рождения??? 😱😱 КОРОЧЕ РЕБЯТА СЕГОДНЯ ДР У ПРИНЦЕССЫ ЧАТА УЛЮП, ТАК ЧТО ДАВАЙТЕ ПОЗДРАВИМ В КОММАХ И ПОЖЕЛАЕМ ЧЕГО-НИБУДЬ ХОРОШЕГО!!!!!! на малой держится весь чат, если вы не в курсе!!! и в честь этого сегодня будут отдельно постики с доттолюмами 🤍 ⟩⟩
⟨⟨ ой ашалеть а у кого сегодня день рождения??? 😱😱 КОРОЧЕ РЕБЯТА СЕГОДНЯ ДР У ПРИНЦЕССЫ ЧАТА УЛЮП, ТАК ЧТО ДАВАЙТЕ ПОЗДРАВИМ В КОММАХ И ПОЖЕЛАЕМ ЧЕГО-НИБУДЬ ХОРОШЕГО!!!!!! на малой держится весь чат, если вы не в курсе!!! и в честь этого сегодня будут отдельно постики с доттолюмами 🤍 ⟩⟩
There was another possible development: Reuters also reported that Ukraine said that Belarus could soon join the invasion of Ukraine. However, the AFP, citing a Pentagon official, said the U.S. hasn’t yet seen evidence that Belarusian troops are in Ukraine. Oh no. There’s a certain degree of myth-making around what exactly went on, so take everything that follows lightly. Telegram was originally launched as a side project by the Durov brothers, with Nikolai handling the coding and Pavel as CEO, while both were at VK. He floated the idea of restricting the use of Telegram in Ukraine and Russia, a suggestion that was met with fierce opposition from users. Shortly after, Durov backed off the idea. Emerson Brooking, a disinformation expert at the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, said: "Back in the Wild West period of content moderation, like 2014 or 2015, maybe they could have gotten away with it, but it stands in marked contrast with how other companies run themselves today." Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores.
from it
