🚗На СибВО, видимо, чей-то батя осознал, что на правом плече у него Даниэль, на левом - Доминик и дрифт посреди проезжей части на ведроиде, помнящем вертикального Ленина - идея блеск.
🏚В это время в Северном рысь доедает собаку из пакета на фоне нового сортира на Таёжке, который просто показывают как красивое, использовать - никак.
🚗На СибВО, видимо, чей-то батя осознал, что на правом плече у него Даниэль, на левом - Доминик и дрифт посреди проезжей части на ведроиде, помнящем вертикального Ленина - идея блеск.
🏚В это время в Северном рысь доедает собаку из пакета на фоне нового сортира на Таёжке, который просто показывают как красивое, использовать - никак.
Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. But because group chats and the channel features are not end-to-end encrypted, Galperin said user privacy is potentially under threat. He floated the idea of restricting the use of Telegram in Ukraine and Russia, a suggestion that was met with fierce opposition from users. Shortly after, Durov backed off the idea. In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback. Again, in contrast to Facebook, Google and Twitter, Telegram's founder Pavel Durov runs his company in relative secrecy from Dubai.
from it
