Notice: file_put_contents(): Write of 7570 bytes failed with errno=28 No space left on device in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 50 DW Беларусь | Telegram Webview: dw_belarus/14195 -
11 декабря пройдет суд по замене Егору Лебедку режима наказания на тюремный, сообщает правозащитный центр "Вясна".
Военный аналитик Егор Лебедок в декабре 2022 года был осужден на 5 лет заключения за интервью медиа, признанного в Беларуси "экстремистским". Он отбывает срок в Ивацевичах. Известно, что аналитика помещали в ШИЗО.
11 декабря пройдет суд по замене Егору Лебедку режима наказания на тюремный, сообщает правозащитный центр "Вясна".
Военный аналитик Егор Лебедок в декабре 2022 года был осужден на 5 лет заключения за интервью медиа, признанного в Беларуси "экстремистским". Он отбывает срок в Ивацевичах. Известно, что аналитика помещали в ШИЗО.
Update March 8, 2022: EFF has clarified that Channels and Groups are not fully encrypted, end-to-end, updated our post to link to Telegram’s FAQ for Cloud and Secret chats, updated to clarify that auto-delete is available for group and channel admins, and added some additional links. Channels are not fully encrypted, end-to-end. All communications on a Telegram channel can be seen by anyone on the channel and are also visible to Telegram. Telegram may be asked by a government to hand over the communications from a channel. Telegram has a history of standing up to Russian government requests for data, but how comfortable you are relying on that history to predict future behavior is up to you. Because Telegram has this data, it may also be stolen by hackers or leaked by an internal employee. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. Asked about its stance on disinformation, Telegram spokesperson Remi Vaughn told AFP: "As noted by our CEO, the sheer volume of information being shared on channels makes it extremely difficult to verify, so it's important that users double-check what they read." He said that since his platform does not have the capacity to check all channels, it may restrict some in Russia and Ukraine "for the duration of the conflict," but then reversed course hours later after many users complained that Telegram was an important source of information.
from it