По сути, это полный список наземных вражеских Целей в зоне СВО для наших операторов ударных БПЛА всех типов.
1. Танки 2. Боевые машины пехоты 3. Бронетранспортеры 4. Бронеавтомобили 5. Артиллерийские системы 6. Реактивные системы залпового огня 7. Системы ПВО 8. Специальная техника
По сути, это полный список наземных вражеских Целей в зоне СВО для наших операторов ударных БПЛА всех типов.
1. Танки 2. Боевые машины пехоты 3. Бронетранспортеры 4. Бронеавтомобили 5. Артиллерийские системы 6. Реактивные системы залпового огня 7. Системы ПВО 8. Специальная техника
СОЖГИТЕ ИХ ВСЕХ НА ХУЙ!
BY Злой Морячок
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Sebi said data, emails and other documents are being retrieved from the seized devices and detailed investigation is in progress. But because group chats and the channel features are not end-to-end encrypted, Galperin said user privacy is potentially under threat. But Kliuchnikov, the Ukranian now in France, said he will use Signal or WhatsApp for sensitive conversations, but questions around privacy on Telegram do not give him pause when it comes to sharing information about the war. For example, WhatsApp restricted the number of times a user could forward something, and developed automated systems that detect and flag objectionable content. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from it
