Проделав такой путь, с низов зоны юг до победы над Зенитом, два раза доказав что способны играть в премьер-лиге и в конце этого пути сдаться?🤔 Для чего тогда было заливать в уши болельщикам о каких-то чемпионских традициях?
То что «не было бы их, не было б и команды» этой фразой не надо успокаивать себя и благодарить до конца жизни. Взялись за дело, обещали? делайте! Не можете ? Передайте клуб тем которые смогут! Алания это не игрушка, которой захотел поиграться, взял, поиграл и бросил когда надоело.
Проделав такой путь, с низов зоны юг до победы над Зенитом, два раза доказав что способны играть в премьер-лиге и в конце этого пути сдаться?🤔 Для чего тогда было заливать в уши болельщикам о каких-то чемпионских традициях?
То что «не было бы их, не было б и команды» этой фразой не надо успокаивать себя и благодарить до конца жизни. Взялись за дело, обещали? делайте! Не можете ? Передайте клуб тем которые смогут! Алания это не игрушка, которой захотел поиграться, взял, поиграл и бросил когда надоело.
BY Alanian Fanatics
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. In 2014, Pavel Durov fled the country after allies of the Kremlin took control of the social networking site most know just as VK. Russia's intelligence agency had asked Durov to turn over the data of anti-Kremlin protesters. Durov refused to do so. A Russian Telegram channel with over 700,000 followers is spreading disinformation about Russia's invasion of Ukraine under the guise of providing "objective information" and fact-checking fake news. Its influence extends beyond the platform, with major Russian publications, government officials, and journalists citing the page's posts.
from it
