Дорогие коллеги-админы, регулярно проверяю в статистике, кто канал репстит, но на манеже все те же, и если вдруг хотите присоединиться к нашей карусели, черканите в камментах что ли
Дорогие коллеги-админы, регулярно проверяю в статистике, кто канал репстит, но на манеже все те же, и если вдруг хотите присоединиться к нашей карусели, черканите в камментах что ли
BY На словах Іван Франко 🇺🇦
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Recently, Durav wrote on his Telegram channel that users' right to privacy, in light of the war in Ukraine, is "sacred, now more than ever." He said that since his platform does not have the capacity to check all channels, it may restrict some in Russia and Ukraine "for the duration of the conflict," but then reversed course hours later after many users complained that Telegram was an important source of information. Russian President Vladimir Putin launched Russia's invasion of Ukraine in the early-morning hours of February 24, targeting several key cities with military strikes. What distinguishes the app from competitors is its use of what's known as channels: Public or private feeds of photos and videos that can be set up by one person or an organization. The channels have become popular with on-the-ground journalists, aid workers and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who broadcasts on a Telegram channel. The channels can be followed by an unlimited number of people. Unlike Facebook, Twitter and other popular social networks, there is no advertising on Telegram and the flow of information is not driven by an algorithm. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp.
from it
