ИЗОЛЕНТА Live #1672| 1.12.24 | Обострение протестов в Грузии| Новые заявления Трампа| Рейды в клубах
🟠Разгорится ли в Грузии "майдан" по украинскому сценарию? 🟠Новые заявление Трампа 🟠Рейды в ночных клубах Москвы 🟠Запреты в военное время 🟠Как происходит подмена ценностей и изменение мировоззрения?
ИЗОЛЕНТА Live #1672| 1.12.24 | Обострение протестов в Грузии| Новые заявления Трампа| Рейды в клубах
🟠Разгорится ли в Грузии "майдан" по украинскому сценарию? 🟠Новые заявление Трампа 🟠Рейды в ночных клубах Москвы 🟠Запреты в военное время 🟠Как происходит подмена ценностей и изменение мировоззрения?
Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. But Telegram says people want to keep their chat history when they get a new phone, and they like having a data backup that will sync their chats across multiple devices. And that is why they let people choose whether they want their messages to be encrypted or not. When not turned on, though, chats are stored on Telegram's services, which are scattered throughout the world. But it has "disclosed 0 bytes of user data to third parties, including governments," Telegram states on its website. He adds: "Telegram has become my primary news source." But because group chats and the channel features are not end-to-end encrypted, Galperin said user privacy is potentially under threat. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from it
