Вспомнилось вот, что 8 лет назад, после первой победы Трампа, в голландских магазинах детские журнальчики о Дональде Даке были переставлены в раздел общественно-политических СМИ. Интересно, сейчас то же самое? Или наоборот, журналы о Дональде Трампе перекочевали в раздел фантастики?
Вспомнилось вот, что 8 лет назад, после первой победы Трампа, в голландских магазинах детские журнальчики о Дональде Даке были переставлены в раздел общественно-политических СМИ. Интересно, сейчас то же самое? Или наоборот, журналы о Дональде Трампе перекочевали в раздел фантастики?
"For Telegram, accountability has always been a problem, which is why it was so popular even before the full-scale war with far-right extremists and terrorists from all over the world," she told AFP from her safe house outside the Ukrainian capital. The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) had carried out a similar exercise in 2017 in a matter related to circulation of messages through WhatsApp. The company maintains that it cannot act against individual or group chats, which are “private amongst their participants,” but it will respond to requests in relation to sticker sets, channels and bots which are publicly available. During the invasion of Ukraine, Pavel Durov has wrestled with this issue a lot more prominently than he has before. Channels like Donbass Insider and Bellum Acta, as reported by Foreign Policy, started pumping out pro-Russian propaganda as the invasion began. So much so that the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council issued a statement labeling which accounts are Russian-backed. Ukrainian officials, in potential violation of the Geneva Convention, have shared imagery of dead and captured Russian soldiers on the platform. Recently, Durav wrote on his Telegram channel that users' right to privacy, in light of the war in Ukraine, is "sacred, now more than ever." So, uh, whenever I hear about Telegram, it’s always in relation to something bad. What gives?
from it
