Ох и интересные новости приходят с Юга - часть войск начали выводить с Херсонского направления.
Узнаем детали, но на фоне ударов ВСУ по мостам в Херсоне и Каховке выглядит очень наглядно. Напомним, мы инсайдили, что в фактическом окружении (под огневым контролем) находятся около 20 тысяч российских военных, часть из которых хотела дезертировать.
Ох и интересные новости приходят с Юга - часть войск начали выводить с Херсонского направления.
Узнаем детали, но на фоне ударов ВСУ по мостам в Херсоне и Каховке выглядит очень наглядно. Напомним, мы инсайдили, что в фактическом окружении (под огневым контролем) находятся около 20 тысяч российских военных, часть из которых хотела дезертировать.
BY Кремлевская табакерка
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Emerson Brooking, a disinformation expert at the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, said: "Back in the Wild West period of content moderation, like 2014 or 2015, maybe they could have gotten away with it, but it stands in marked contrast with how other companies run themselves today." The next bit isn’t clear, but Durov reportedly claimed that his resignation, dated March 21st, was an April Fools’ prank. TechCrunch implies that it was a matter of principle, but it’s hard to be clear on the wheres, whos and whys. Similarly, on April 17th, the Moscow Times quoted Durov as saying that he quit the company after being pressured to reveal account details about Ukrainians protesting the then-president Viktor Yanukovych. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. "There are a lot of things that Telegram could have been doing this whole time. And they know exactly what they are and they've chosen not to do them. That's why I don't trust them," she said.
from it
