Издание Bild пишет, что Дания предложила платить по €27 000 сирийским беженцам за добровольное возвращение на родину. Сирийцы, которые согласятся добровольно вернуться домой, получат по €27 000, а на каждую ребенка - еще по €6700. Правительство заявило, что такая инициатива экономически выгоднее, так как значительная часть сирийских беженцев не трудоустроена.
Датчане в отчаянии готовы на все лишь бы бабахи уехали, а те возьмут деньги, а потом вернутся обратно.
Издание Bild пишет, что Дания предложила платить по €27 000 сирийским беженцам за добровольное возвращение на родину. Сирийцы, которые согласятся добровольно вернуться домой, получат по €27 000, а на каждую ребенка - еще по €6700. Правительство заявило, что такая инициатива экономически выгоднее, так как значительная часть сирийских беженцев не трудоустроена.
Датчане в отчаянии готовы на все лишь бы бабахи уехали, а те возьмут деньги, а потом вернутся обратно.
On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. Recently, Durav wrote on his Telegram channel that users' right to privacy, in light of the war in Ukraine, is "sacred, now more than ever." "There are several million Russians who can lift their head up from propaganda and try to look for other sources, and I'd say that most look for it on Telegram," he said. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. Channels are not fully encrypted, end-to-end. All communications on a Telegram channel can be seen by anyone on the channel and are also visible to Telegram. Telegram may be asked by a government to hand over the communications from a channel. Telegram has a history of standing up to Russian government requests for data, but how comfortable you are relying on that history to predict future behavior is up to you. Because Telegram has this data, it may also be stolen by hackers or leaked by an internal employee.
from it
