Пока по ощущениям кажутся удобными, но с размерами странная история: я заказывала несколько разных одного размера, среди них были и большие, и маленькие, и в самый раз, так что пробуйте угадать))
*одежда у бренда тоже приятная имеется, мерила такое платье, но на мой живот уже не подошло, так что я снова в поисках 🥲
Пока по ощущениям кажутся удобными, но с размерами странная история: я заказывала несколько разных одного размера, среди них были и большие, и маленькие, и в самый раз, так что пробуйте угадать))
*одежда у бренда тоже приятная имеется, мерила такое платье, но на мой живот уже не подошло, так что я снова в поисках 🥲
At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised. So, uh, whenever I hear about Telegram, it’s always in relation to something bad. What gives? Oh no. There’s a certain degree of myth-making around what exactly went on, so take everything that follows lightly. Telegram was originally launched as a side project by the Durov brothers, with Nikolai handling the coding and Pavel as CEO, while both were at VK. This ability to mix the public and the private, as well as the ability to use bots to engage with users has proved to be problematic. In early 2021, a database selling phone numbers pulled from Facebook was selling numbers for $20 per lookup. Similarly, security researchers found a network of deepfake bots on the platform that were generating images of people submitted by users to create non-consensual imagery, some of which involved children. Although some channels have been removed, the curation process is considered opaque and insufficient by analysts.
from it
