Сегодня, в 22.00, на канале «Спас»! Сама в это время буду на концерте Алексея Поддубного (Джанго), скорее всего, не смогу посмотреть эфир. Поэтому вся надежда на вас, потом расскажете!) 🤗
Сегодня, в 22.00, на канале «Спас»! Сама в это время буду на концерте Алексея Поддубного (Джанго), скорее всего, не смогу посмотреть эфир. Поэтому вся надежда на вас, потом расскажете!) 🤗
So, uh, whenever I hear about Telegram, it’s always in relation to something bad. What gives? Markets continued to grapple with the economic and corporate earnings implications relating to the Russia-Ukraine conflict. “We have a ton of uncertainty right now,” said Stephanie Link, chief investment strategist and portfolio manager at Hightower Advisors. “We’re dealing with a war, we’re dealing with inflation. We don’t know what it means to earnings.” Multiple pro-Kremlin media figures circulated the post's false claims, including prominent Russian journalist Vladimir Soloviev and the state-controlled Russian outlet RT, according to the DFR Lab's report. "The argument from Telegram is, 'You should trust us because we tell you that we're trustworthy,'" Maréchal said. "It's really in the eye of the beholder whether that's something you want to buy into." Telegram boasts 500 million users, who share information individually and in groups in relative security. But Telegram's use as a one-way broadcast channel — which followers can join but not reply to — means content from inauthentic accounts can easily reach large, captive and eager audiences.
from it
