Нет, я не кровожадный… и вообще за права человека и все такое. Но… с таким «букетом» человек не только не уезжает в СИЗО, но даже не получает домашний арест 🤷♂️
И это при том, что наши места принудительного содержания переполнены крадунами на >2500 руб. или торчубесами взятыми с «весом», которые не несут абсолютно никакой общественной опасности.
Нет, я не кровожадный… и вообще за права человека и все такое. Но… с таким «букетом» человек не только не уезжает в СИЗО, но даже не получает домашний арест 🤷♂️
И это при том, что наши места принудительного содержания переполнены крадунами на >2500 руб. или торчубесами взятыми с «весом», которые не несут абсолютно никакой общественной опасности.
What distinguishes the app from competitors is its use of what's known as channels: Public or private feeds of photos and videos that can be set up by one person or an organization. The channels have become popular with on-the-ground journalists, aid workers and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who broadcasts on a Telegram channel. The channels can be followed by an unlimited number of people. Unlike Facebook, Twitter and other popular social networks, there is no advertising on Telegram and the flow of information is not driven by an algorithm. Oh no. There’s a certain degree of myth-making around what exactly went on, so take everything that follows lightly. Telegram was originally launched as a side project by the Durov brothers, with Nikolai handling the coding and Pavel as CEO, while both were at VK. Telegram boasts 500 million users, who share information individually and in groups in relative security. But Telegram's use as a one-way broadcast channel — which followers can join but not reply to — means content from inauthentic accounts can easily reach large, captive and eager audiences. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. He floated the idea of restricting the use of Telegram in Ukraine and Russia, a suggestion that was met with fierce opposition from users. Shortly after, Durov backed off the idea.
from it
