Общагу Бауманки все-таки согласовали. Мы не особо верили в этот проект, когда его публиковали. Потому что, здание больше похоже на офисник, а не на общагу, да и выглядит слишком хорошо для общежития. Как будто в Бауманке деньги карманы жмут - они такие общаги хотят строить.
Интересно, что будет внутри всей этой радости, а то в общаге имени дяди Леонтьевича внутри настоящий общажный ад.
Общагу Бауманки все-таки согласовали. Мы не особо верили в этот проект, когда его публиковали. Потому что, здание больше похоже на офисник, а не на общагу, да и выглядит слишком хорошо для общежития. Как будто в Бауманке деньги карманы жмут - они такие общаги хотят строить.
Интересно, что будет внутри всей этой радости, а то в общаге имени дяди Леонтьевича внутри настоящий общажный ад.
Channels are not fully encrypted, end-to-end. All communications on a Telegram channel can be seen by anyone on the channel and are also visible to Telegram. Telegram may be asked by a government to hand over the communications from a channel. Telegram has a history of standing up to Russian government requests for data, but how comfortable you are relying on that history to predict future behavior is up to you. Because Telegram has this data, it may also be stolen by hackers or leaked by an internal employee. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. "For Telegram, accountability has always been a problem, which is why it was so popular even before the full-scale war with far-right extremists and terrorists from all over the world," she told AFP from her safe house outside the Ukrainian capital. The next bit isn’t clear, but Durov reportedly claimed that his resignation, dated March 21st, was an April Fools’ prank. TechCrunch implies that it was a matter of principle, but it’s hard to be clear on the wheres, whos and whys. Similarly, on April 17th, the Moscow Times quoted Durov as saying that he quit the company after being pressured to reveal account details about Ukrainians protesting the then-president Viktor Yanukovych. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from it
