⚡️Минстрой поднимет вопрос цены квадратного метра для граждан, заявил замглавы ведомства Никита Стасишин.
🗣️"Ни разу мы как министерство не поднимали вопрос цены квадратного метра для наших граждан. Сейчас будем", - сказал он на Московском форуме лидеров рынка недвижимости. @ria_realty
⚡️Минстрой поднимет вопрос цены квадратного метра для граждан, заявил замглавы ведомства Никита Стасишин.
🗣️"Ни разу мы как министерство не поднимали вопрос цены квадратного метра для наших граждан. Сейчас будем", - сказал он на Московском форуме лидеров рынка недвижимости. @ria_realty
BY РИА Недвижимость
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. Asked about its stance on disinformation, Telegram spokesperson Remi Vaughn told AFP: "As noted by our CEO, the sheer volume of information being shared on channels makes it extremely difficult to verify, so it's important that users double-check what they read." "The argument from Telegram is, 'You should trust us because we tell you that we're trustworthy,'" Maréchal said. "It's really in the eye of the beholder whether that's something you want to buy into." In a message on his Telegram channel recently recounting the episode, Durov wrote: "I lost my company and my home, but would do it again – without hesitation."
from it
