Полонез op.53 Фредерика Шопена, известный также как «Героический полонез», является одним из самых мощных и вдохновляющих произведений композитора. Написанный в 1842 году, этот полонез сочетает в себе величественные марши и виртуозные пассажи, олицетворяя силу и дух борьбы.
Шопен через эту пьесу выразил свои патриотические чувства к родной Польше, наполнив её энергией и драматизмом. Полонез op.53 стал символом национальной гордости и одним из самых популярных произведений в фортепианном репертуаре.
Полонез op.53 Фредерика Шопена, известный также как «Героический полонез», является одним из самых мощных и вдохновляющих произведений композитора. Написанный в 1842 году, этот полонез сочетает в себе величественные марши и виртуозные пассажи, олицетворяя силу и дух борьбы.
Шопен через эту пьесу выразил свои патриотические чувства к родной Польше, наполнив её энергией и драматизмом. Полонез op.53 стал символом национальной гордости и одним из самых популярных произведений в фортепианном репертуаре.
You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. Since its launch in 2013, Telegram has grown from a simple messaging app to a broadcast network. Its user base isn’t as vast as WhatsApp’s, and its broadcast platform is a fraction the size of Twitter, but it’s nonetheless showing its use. While Telegram has been embroiled in controversy for much of its life, it has become a vital source of communication during the invasion of Ukraine. But, if all of this is new to you, let us explain, dear friends, what on Earth a Telegram is meant to be, and why you should, or should not, need to care. But the Ukraine Crisis Media Center's Tsekhanovska points out that communications are often down in zones most affected by the war, making this sort of cross-referencing a luxury many cannot afford. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. Emerson Brooking, a disinformation expert at the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, said: "Back in the Wild West period of content moderation, like 2014 or 2015, maybe they could have gotten away with it, but it stands in marked contrast with how other companies run themselves today."
from it
