Пассионарии действительно есть. Несмотря на их многолетнее систематическое истребление. И есть ситуативный запрос на них сверху. Но это означает только одно: поскольку у нас никогда не умели/не стремились отличать мошенников от пассионариев, в приемных сейчас выстраиваются очереди из детей лейтенанта Шмидта, безошибочно чующих своим криминальным нутром возможность поживиться на патриотической теме. А реальные пассионарии, выжившие в 2014-15 гг., помнят, чем закончился их порыв, и теперь настороженно наблюдают. Система в очередной раз сулит фундаментальные изменения, оздоровление и т.д., но пока видим движение скорее в обратном направлении. Т.е. все как всегда – менять, ничего не меняя.
Пассионарии действительно есть. Несмотря на их многолетнее систематическое истребление. И есть ситуативный запрос на них сверху. Но это означает только одно: поскольку у нас никогда не умели/не стремились отличать мошенников от пассионариев, в приемных сейчас выстраиваются очереди из детей лейтенанта Шмидта, безошибочно чующих своим криминальным нутром возможность поживиться на патриотической теме. А реальные пассионарии, выжившие в 2014-15 гг., помнят, чем закончился их порыв, и теперь настороженно наблюдают. Система в очередной раз сулит фундаментальные изменения, оздоровление и т.д., но пока видим движение скорее в обратном направлении. Т.е. все как всегда – менять, ничего не меняя.
BY Русский Мир. Украина
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. This ability to mix the public and the private, as well as the ability to use bots to engage with users has proved to be problematic. In early 2021, a database selling phone numbers pulled from Facebook was selling numbers for $20 per lookup. Similarly, security researchers found a network of deepfake bots on the platform that were generating images of people submitted by users to create non-consensual imagery, some of which involved children. The next bit isn’t clear, but Durov reportedly claimed that his resignation, dated March 21st, was an April Fools’ prank. TechCrunch implies that it was a matter of principle, but it’s hard to be clear on the wheres, whos and whys. Similarly, on April 17th, the Moscow Times quoted Durov as saying that he quit the company after being pressured to reveal account details about Ukrainians protesting the then-president Viktor Yanukovych. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. Either way, Durov says that he withdrew his resignation but that he was ousted from his company anyway. Subsequently, control of the company was reportedly handed to oligarchs Alisher Usmanov and Igor Sechin, both allegedly close associates of Russian leader Vladimir Putin.
from it
