🇷🇺🇺🇦 На текущий момент бои идут в районе села Бердин к северо-востоку от Суджи, где пока зафиксирован наиболее высокий уровень активности противника.
Заявления о якобы потере населенного пункта действительности не соответствуют — на этом участке ВСУ пока только потеряли живую силу и несколько единиц техники.
Тем не менее и бежать впереди паровоза с победными реляциями пока не стоит: основные события очередной попытки наступления ВСУ явно еще впереди. #Курск #Россия #Украина @rybar
🇷🇺🇺🇦 На текущий момент бои идут в районе села Бердин к северо-востоку от Суджи, где пока зафиксирован наиболее высокий уровень активности противника.
Заявления о якобы потере населенного пункта действительности не соответствуют — на этом участке ВСУ пока только потеряли живую силу и несколько единиц техники.
Тем не менее и бежать впереди паровоза с победными реляциями пока не стоит: основные события очередной попытки наступления ВСУ явно еще впереди. #Курск #Россия #Украина @rybar
At its heart, Telegram is little more than a messaging app like WhatsApp or Signal. But it also offers open channels that enable a single user, or a group of users, to communicate with large numbers in a method similar to a Twitter account. This has proven to be both a blessing and a curse for Telegram and its users, since these channels can be used for both good and ill. Right now, as Wired reports, the app is a key way for Ukrainians to receive updates from the government during the invasion. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. False news often spreads via public groups, or chats, with potentially fatal effects. "He has to start being more proactive and to find a real solution to this situation, not stay in standby without interfering. It's a very irresponsible position from the owner of Telegram," she said. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from it
