Самый эффективный способ профилактики конфликтов и проблем с персоналом, взаимоотношениями и тд в ближайшем будущем - … как преимущественно советуют аптропологи-футурологи, есть снижение доли «протеинового» (человеческого) труда в производимых товарах и услугах. Это - мой вывод по итогам чтения свежих публикаций исследований и рекомендаций.
Самый эффективный способ профилактики конфликтов и проблем с персоналом, взаимоотношениями и тд в ближайшем будущем - … как преимущественно советуют аптропологи-футурологи, есть снижение доли «протеинового» (человеческого) труда в производимых товарах и услугах. Это - мой вывод по итогам чтения свежих публикаций исследований и рекомендаций.
BY Сам себе СЕО
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. Recently, Durav wrote on his Telegram channel that users' right to privacy, in light of the war in Ukraine, is "sacred, now more than ever." Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. Although some channels have been removed, the curation process is considered opaque and insufficient by analysts. Some privacy experts say Telegram is not secure enough
from it
